Authored by David Stockman, author of "The Great Deformation"
A decisive tipping point in the evolution of American capitalism and
democracy—the triumph of crony capitalism—took place on October 3, 2008.
That was the day of the forced march approval on Capitol Hill of the
$700 billion TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) bill to bail out Wall
Street.
This spasm of financial market intervention, including
multi-trillion-dollar support lines provided to the big banks and
financial companies by the Federal Reserve, was but the latest brick in
the foundation of a fundamentally anti-capitalist rĂ©gime known as “Too
Big to Fail” (TBTF). It had been under construction for many
decades, but now there was no turning back. The Wall Street bailouts of
2008 shattered what little remained of the old-time fiscal rules.
There was no longer any pretense that the free market should
determine winners and losers and that tapping the public treasury
requires proof of compelling societal benefit. Not when
AAA-rated General Electric had been given $30 billion in taxpayer loans
and guarantees to avoid taking modest losses on toxic assets it had
foolishly funded with overnight borrowings that suddenly couldn’t be
rolled over.
Even more improbably, Goldman Sachs had been handed $10 billion to
save itself from alleged extinction. Yet it then swiveled on a dime and
generated a $29 billion financial surplus—$16 billion in salary and
bonuses on top of $13 billion in net income—for the year that began just
three months later.
Even if Goldman didn’t really need the money, as it later claimed, a
round trip from purported rags to evident riches in fifteen months
stretched the bounds of credulity. It was reminiscent of actor Gary
Cooper’s immortal 1950s expression of suspicion about Communism. “From
what I have heard about it,” he told a congressional committee, “it
isn’t on the level.”
Nor was Washington’s panicked bailout of Wall Street on the level; it was both unnecessary and targeted at the wrong problem. The
so-called financial meltdown was not the real crisis; it was only the
tip of the iceberg, the leading edge of a more fundamental economic
malady. In truth, the US economy was heading for the wringer because a
multi-decade spree of unsustainable borrowing, speculation, and
financialization of the national economy was coming to an abrupt end.
In the years after 1980, America had undergone the equivalent of a national leveraged buyout (LBO).
It was now saddled with $30 trillion more in combined public and
private debt than would have been the case under the time-tested canons
of financial discipline and prudence which prevailed during the nation’s
long economic ascent. This massive debt burden had fueled a
three-decade prosperity party by mortgaging the nation’s future. Now the
bill was coming due and our national simulacrum of prosperity was over.
This rendezvous with the limits of “peak debt,” however, did
not mean that the Main Street economy was in danger of collapse into an
instant depression. That was the specious claim of the
bailsters. What did threaten was a deeper and more enduring adversity.
The demise of this thirty-year debt super cycle actually meant that it
was payback time. Instead of swiping growth from the future, the
American economy would now face a long twilight of debt deflation and
struggle to restore household, corporate, and public sector solvency.
This abrupt turn in the road should not have been surprising.
America’s fantastic collective binging on debt, public and private, had
no historical precedent. During the century prior to 1980, for example,
total public and private debt on US balance sheets rarely exceeded 1.6
times GDP. When the national borrowing spree reached its apogee in 2007,
however, the $4 trillion of new debt issued by households, business,
banks, and governments amounted to 6 times that year’s $700 billion gain
in GDP. Plain and simple, what was being recorded as GDP growth was
little more than faux prosperity borrowed from the future.
In fact, by the time of the financial crisis total US debt
outstanding was $52 trillion and represented 3.6 times national income
of $14 trillion. Accordingly, there were now two full turns of extra
debt weighing on the nation’s economy. And the embedded math was
forbidding: at the historic leverage ratio of 1.6 times national income,
which had prevailed for most of the hundred years prior to 1980, total
US public and private debt would have been only $22 trillion at the end
of 2008.
So the nation’s households, businesses, and taxpayers were now lugging around the aforementioned $30 trillion in excess debt.
This staggering financial burden dwarfed levels which had historically
been proven to be healthy, prudent, and sustainable. TARP and all its
kindred bailouts and the Fed’s ceaseless money printing could not
relieve it. And Washington’s reckless use of Uncle Sam’s credit card to
fund the Obama stimulus actually made it far worse by attempting to
revive the false prosperity of the bubble years. The obvious question
remains: Why did this plague of debt arise? Did the American people
suddenly become profligate and greedy through a mysterious process of
moral and social decay?
There is no evidence for the greed disease theory but plenty of reason to suspect a more foreboding cause. The
real reason for the current crisis of debt and financial disorder is
that public policy had veered into the ditch, permitting an
unprecedented aggrandizement of the state and its central banking
branch. In the process, the vital nerve center of capitalism,
its money and capital markets, had been perverted and deformed. Wall
Street has become a vast casino where leveraged speculation and rent
seeking have displaced its vital function of price discovery and capital
allocation.
The September 2008 financial crisis, therefore, was about the need to
drastically deflate the Wall Street behemoths—that is, dangerous and
unstable gambling houses—fostered by decades of money printing and
market rigging by the Fed. Yet policy veered in the opposite direction,
propping them up and thereby perpetuating their baleful effects, owing
to a predicate that was dead wrong.
A handful of panic-stricken top officials, led by treasury
secretary Hank Paulson and Fed chairman Ben Bernanke, proclaimed that
the financial system had been stricken by a deadly “contagion” that had
come out of nowhere and threatened a chain reaction of financial
failures that would end in cataclysm. That proposition was
completely false, but it gave rise to a fateful injunction—namely, that
all the normal rules of free market capitalism and fiscal prudence
needed to be suspended so that unprecedented and unlimited public
resources could be poured into the rescue of Wall Street’s floundering
behemoths...
No comments:
Post a Comment